Mariyana Ilieva (2024) published a paper titled "Should Using AI-Generated Text to Create Academic Papers Be Considered Plagiarism?". It's asking about the legality of using AI generative tools in academic writing.
AI-generated text itself has a high similarity score when checked by plagiarism checkers. We recently published plagiarism checking scores for text generated by AI using several plagiarism detection tools, and it consistently shows a high plagiarism/similarity score. For now, using AI-generated content will be detected as plagiarism because it has a high similarity score.
How when someone using super AI which passing similarity test?
Some journal wants 'Declaration of Generative AI in Sciencetific Writing'. |
Someday, AI generative tools may become an uncontrollable power with unbelievable superiority. Academic honesty is paramount. Some journals, like Elsevier, are now publishing guidelines for using AI. The guidelines instruct authors to include a 'Declaration of Generative AI in Scientific Writing' section in the paper. The declaration should at least include the names of the AI tools used and the context in which they were applied.
Here is an example of an AI Declaration from the NLP Journal:
During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article (Elsevier, n.d.).
Reference
Ilieva, M. (2024). Следва ли използването на генериран с AI текст за създаване на академични разработки да се приема за плагиатство?. Медии и комуникации на 21. век, 8(1), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.54664/CFDI9350
Elsevier. (n.d.). Guide for authors - Natural Language Processing Journal. ScienceDirect. Retrieved January 2, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/natural-language-processing-journal/publish/guide-for-authors
Comments
Post a Comment